Not unexpected that CNN will be described as a reliable medium compared to the
Internet when not so long ago it was described as the unreliable medium itself
due to lack of thoughtful mediation by authoritarian Speak Truths.

But TV was not so long ago seen as suspect compared to newspapers and
newspapers suspect compared to government edicts and government edicts suspect
compared to religious preachings and religious yarping nothing compared to
acts of gods angry at copulating humanoids.

So what if pixels lie, how is that different from any authority issuance from
heads all too often quoted as believe you us who know?

Shame on those pipsqueak authorities cited as being gravely concerned about
lying pixels and the unmanageable Internet. Their self-promoting lies are
showing hoary signs of thin-skinned unbelievability sensing doodoo die-out.

National defense of any persuasion is a matter of suspended disbelief, not
that you should not chaff  your sorry ass when the drones come sniffing: US
citizens in the US homeland are now fair game for the assassination squads
eager to show the budget inceases were not in vain. 

Blonde hair and blue eyes with chic cammie clothing is now the best
prophylactic against fat ethnics sitting with consoles programmed to blowdown
off-coloreds. Nothing illegal about killing your own kind when sanctioned by
secret presidential pixels.

Reply via email to