I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the development list since only 2 months.
However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ? I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good quality, motivation and documentation. I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream. Waiting for yours Regards, Fabio Pietrosanti Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/ >> > > I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox > patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead. > Just tested it, it works great. > > The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool. It documents the > -n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does > all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up > multi-record set and delete operations. In particularly, you > can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \ > cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast. Yay. > > I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion. > http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-dbtool-transaction-2.3.9.diff > > Enjoy, > > Bron. >
