A lot of the patches (past and present) have been implemented. Some of
the others will be implemented in time. Others may not.
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the
development list since only 2 months.
However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement
the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ?
I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good
quality, motivation and documentation.
I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream.
Waiting for yours
Regards,
Fabio Pietrosanti
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox
patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead.
Just tested it, it works great.
The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool. It documents the
-n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does
all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up
multi-record set and delete operations. In particularly, you
can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \
cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast. Yay.
I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion.
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-dbtool-transaction-2.3.9.diff
Enjoy,
Bron.
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
