On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:37:59 +0200 Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jaro...@intra2net.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 14. April 2011 17:45:11 Thomas Jarosch wrote: > > Here's my proposal to make duplicate suppression more robust: > > Combine the "message-id" header field with the "date" header field > > for the duplicate check. If a broken client reuses the message-id, > > there's a good chance the date field changed. > > > > Opinions? > > Since noone objected, we're going to implement this around the end of July. > The patch will be sent to the list. Sounds good to me. Thanks. Bron.
