On 06/16/2011 04:20 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:37:59 +0200
Thomas Jarosch<thomas.jaro...@intra2net.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14. April 2011 17:45:11 Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Here's my proposal to make duplicate suppression more robust:
Combine the "message-id" header field with the "date" header field
for the duplicate check. If a broken client reuses the message-id,
there's a good chance the date field changed.
Opinions?
Since noone objected, we're going to implement this around the end of July.
The patch will be sent to the list.
Sounds good to me. Thanks.
Agreed. That catches the common cases of duplicates (mail sent to a
list and cc'd to a person on the list, for example) but won't screw
people who use Outlook. I see no downside.
Thanks!
Dave
