On Sat, Feb 13, 2016, at 07:47, Ken Murchison wrote: > On 02/09/2016 07:44 PM, Bron Gondwana via Cyrus-devel wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016, at 03:26, Ken Murchison via Cyrus-devel wrote: > >> I haven't decided if we want/should allow a sharee to actually delete a > >> sharer's collection if it has been shared as read-write. I'm think only > >> the owner should be allowed to DELETE a collection that they are sharing. > > We have implemented this at FastMail such that a "DELETE" on a shared > > collection just removes your ACL if you're not the owner, so you can't see > > it > > any more. > I already had that done. > > I'm wondering if there is any circumstance where a sharee should be able > to deleted the actual shared calendar (the one that the sharer owns).
Yeah, maybe - but how would you unambiguously represent intent? I think it's a lot safer to always unshare, and have the owner delete the calendar. Any site that has a pressing need for this could build their own tooling to support it if needed. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm
