Hmm. I don't know if/how this will affect SASL.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jan Parcel via Cyrus-devel wrote: > As a consumer, I'd like to say a couple of things. > > 1. I really REALLY don't want to see it become difficult, on my end, to > get the right versions of the libsasl2 docs on download. Apparently > quite a few pages disappeared between 1.5.28 and 2.1.26, but those pages > still appear in other places (including Solaris, possibly-corrected for > 2.N.N) I don't view them as "part of" imap. > > 2. I've got some severe formatting problems displaying saslauthd(8) , > which I hope is unique to that file and not a trend. saslauthd.8 > appears to be pre-roff'd, it looks like the others are not.
