Hello Samir, it does not make sense to keep the ANNOTATEMORE code just for your specific case.
You are entitled to issue an updated client software dealing with METADATA and ask users to update, or for your server to revert the respective change. Greetings Дилян On September 11, 2018 5:02:02 AM PDT, Samir Aguiar <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Bron, > >On 09/10/2018 08:26 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> The ANNOTATEMORE was a draft which got replaced with METADATA. If >there >> a reason why you are still using the draft rather than the spec which >> was published in 2009? > >Yes, when our groupware client was planned and developed only >ANNOTATEMORE was available. This client is now is in use at several >thousand customers and we have no control over which software version >they use. > >Samir
