Hello Samir, if the opt-in ANNOTATEMORE feature is something that only you will use, as it currently looks like, I see no reason to bother others with it.
Greetings Дилян On September 11, 2018 2:40:48 PM PDT, Samir Aguiar <samir.agu...@intra2net.com> wrote: >Hi Dilyan, > >On 09/11/2018 06:17 PM, Dilyan Palauzov wrote: >> it does not make sense to keep the ANNOTATEMORE code just for your >specific case. >> >> You are entitled to issue an updated client software dealing with >METADATA and ask users to update, or for your server to revert the >respective change. > >Yes, absolutely. We will need to revert that change and restore >ANNOTATEMORE support anyway since it's not possible at the moment for >all of our clients to upgrade. > >But I believe my question was ill-phrased. I actually meant to ask if >such revert, after done by us, would be accepted upstream as an opt-in >feature, or if the team has already decided to drop that implementation >for good. > >Kind regards, >Samir Aguiar