On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Brian Granger wrote: >> Yes, it makes much more sense to call these .pxd files. Most people >> shouldn't need to deal with pxi files at all, but we can still keep >> them. Done. > > So, the official recommendation has changed - use .pxd unless you > really just want simple textual includes?
Yes. I think .pxi files are used mostly for historical reasons, from before .pxd files existed. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
