On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What recommendation are you talking about? Using a pxd file > > to provide a namespace is fine as far as I'm concerned. > > It's one of the things they were invented for. > > Previously, (on this list and at an in person meeting of Sage devs) > some people were saying that .pxi files should be used for this > purpose. Because of these discussions, numpy.pxd was renamed > numpy.pxi, but now this looks like a bad decision. >
It's me. I gave them some advice about using pxi versus pxd files at Sage Days 8, but I did not actually *look* at numpy.pxd before giving said advice. Clearly I was wrong. Sorry for any confusion caused by my offhand comment. -- William _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
