On Jun 6, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi, > > Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> I looked at all the Pyrex changes and incorporated everything we >>> didn't already have >>> except for the GIL and dependancy tracking stuff. > > I finished merging both now and also the parser cleanup (it now has > a parser > context object instead of tons of pass-through keyword arguments, > that was so > over-due...). After adapting lxml to the stricter nogil checking > (and applying > the temporary (?) fix I posted), all seems to work just fine for me. > > I think the next big test is Sage then. Anyone? :)
I plan on doing that later tonight after I get back... I've compiled sage recently with cython-devel, so don't expect any big surprises. > Robert, if I'm not mistaken, this means that the next Cython > release will be > 0.9.8.15, right? Could you double-check that all Pyrex changes are > in now? We > seem to be missing at least the forward declaration > simplifications, Pyrex > changesets 71/74/76. I think they'd be nice to have. Our circular import stuff is a superset of this, but maybe I'm mistaken here. We could support this too if you want. > We also have to check that we added all new test cases from Pyrex, > at least > into the tests/compile and tests/errors directories. I'll have > close to no > time this weekend, but since this is a simple task, maybe someone > else could > take a start here? More tests means a better release on Monday. > > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
