On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > (This is mostly to keep you posted, though if you disagree on the > negative > index thing then speak up). > > I posted a thread on the NumPy mailing list which got much response. I > updated the buffer spec accordingly as how I would like it myself > now. In > particular: > > - Anne Archibald convinced me about the need for negative index > support: > > http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2008-June/ > 035079.html
Thanks for posting there. He's convinced me too. That unsigned int trick is a nice one. > (You can nest yourself to the rest of the thread from there if > interested. > Note especially that unsigned datatypes will be used rather than > pragmas > to flag positive indices) > > - Nobody complained about the [float64, 2]-syntax. No one has come up with anything better either, so lets run with it. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
