On Feb 19, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:

> I have a fix for #200 ready, waiting to be pushed when I have access.
> (I'll attach it to the ticket shortly as well.)

OK, I pushed this. I'm going to do more testing before I close it.

> #143: I could take upon me to disable the current method without
> introducing a new one within a week. Robert, do you want me to do  
> that,
> or do you have plans to do it properly?



> #106 can be moved to 0.11.1 as Robert says.

Moved.

> That should leave running the refnanny on lxml and Sage before one can
> do a release(?). Has there been any attempts on that? I may also be  
> able
> to spend some time (not too much) on refnannying Sage if Robert hasn't
> started on that (if so, I'd be grateful to know how I can add
> CYTHON_REFNANNY to CFLAGS in the Sage build easily)

I haven't done that yet. I'll give it a go and let you know if  
anything comes up (I can do the Sage side of things easily...).

- Robert

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to