Hi,

Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> #106 can be moved to 0.11.1 as Robert says.

+1. Could anyone still give some feedback if this still applies to current
cython-devel?


> That should leave running the refnanny on lxml and Sage before one can 
> do a release(?). Has there been any attempts on that?

I ran lxml's test suite with the refnanny and it looks mostly good, except
for a number of dropped AssertErrors and dropped unnamed(?) exceptions. It
doesn't say where they come from and I was unable to add any traceable
information to the output. There are two plain assert statements in the
refnanny code, but adding text to them doesn't change anything.

I'll post the output here as soon as I get to it.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to