On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>> Likely Dag should review this... If you agree on the patch, please
>>> push ... IMHO, this fix should go to 0.11

The patch looks good, can you make a ticket for it? Also, can you use  
mercurial to output diffs so we get your name and a comment with it  
as well?

>> a) Saying that this should go into 0.11 means saying that this  
>> specific
>> bug is more important than everything else that sits in milestone  
>> 0.11.1
>> in Trac. We probably put out 0.10 with the same bug and the Cython
>> project survived! We need to have some disipline and get things  
>> released
>> -- release early, release often.

Yes, we need to return to the "release early, release often"  
schedule. We can start putting patches up and getting reviews for  
them on trac for 0.11.1 right away. I've added milestone 0.11.2,  
everything that doesn't have a patch or easy fix for 0.11.1 will get  
moved there so we can release 0.11.1 shortly.

> I understand that... I just wanted to point that this fix likely does
> not have high impact and fix 64 bits issues, more or less like recent
> Robert's pushes did.


The last push was to facilitate getting cython 0.11 into the rpm  
repo, though in retrospect I guess it's lower priority than some  
other stuff. At this point, unless there's a major bug, the only  
thing I can see adding is perhaps testcases.

- Robert
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to