Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> and moving a lot of those tickets over to 0.11.2 ? >> (as they are not regressions). We've also had the for loops update >> which >> it would be nice to release sooner rather than later. > > My only hesitance about loops is that it changes (for the better) the > semantics of some loops. Hopefully people haven't been relying on the > old behavior, but is that too much for a 0.11.x release? Granted, it > would only affect people abusing wrong corner cases.
I think this shouldn't affect the timeframe though. We always have the option of releasing cython-devel as 0.12 because the semantics has changed. (If you do so, rename the milestones rather than move the tickets :-) ). (I think the other option, backing out the loop changes and move them to cython-unstable, a waste of valuable developer time in this case). -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
