On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>> and moving a lot of those tickets over to 0.11.2 ? >>>> (as they are not regressions). We've also had the for loops update >>>> which it would be nice to release sooner rather than later. >>> >>> My only hesitance about loops is that it changes (for the better) >>> the >>> semantics of some loops. Hopefully people haven't been relying on >>> the >>> old behavior, but is that too much for a 0.11.x release? Granted, it >>> would only affect people abusing wrong corner cases. > > I'm not sure either. We might think about moving the change to 0.12 > entirely, but I actually consider it a bug that gets fixed. The > sooner, the > better. Fixing it right in 0.11.1 would make that clear.
I consider it a bug too, the only hesitance is the philosophy that any code that works with 0.11 should also work unchanged with 0.11.1. Given that it's already in the devel branch, I'll move my changes fixes there too. Is there anything else in -unstable that's deemed stable enough to be released? Also, if there's anything inhttp:// trac.cython.org/cython_trac/milestone/0.11.1 that anyone thinks should really go in this next release (if so, mark it as critical or blocker). - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
