Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Apr 3, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Danilo Freitas wrote: > >> So, I think one thing I need to change, is that instead of creating a >> template syntax, I'll work on improving an already existing syntax >> right? > > Probably, yes. > >> And so that it should be useful all templates (including STL)? >> >> And should I also work on those ohter problems? I'm afraid of putting >> many things on proposal, and don't finish it in time. :/ > > As expected, this could turn into a huge wishlist of things that > would be nice to have, certainly not all feasible for a GSoC > project :). I would say > > (1) Being able to wrap templated code
What's needed is a) Parse new syntax for declaring templates b) Register that information in PyrexTypes/Symtab c) Output the type arguments directly to C++. so it's not very much work (on the same order as complex float support, say). > (2) Polyomorphic functions > > would be the priorities, and allow a nearly full wrapping of STL. If > time permits Doesn't polymorphic functions work currently? I'd think that were one of the few C++ things that *do* work in Cython. Do you mean "overloaded" functions? Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
