Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Apr 3, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> On Apr 3, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Danilo Freitas wrote: >>> >>>> So, I think one thing I need to change, is that instead of >>>> creating a >>>> template syntax, I'll work on improving an already existing syntax >>>> right? >>> Probably, yes. >>> >>>> And so that it should be useful all templates (including STL)? >>>> >>>> And should I also work on those ohter problems? I'm afraid of >>>> putting >>>> many things on proposal, and don't finish it in time. :/ > > BTW, despite being past the deadline, I think the proposal can be > updated while it's being evaluated.
At least it can be updated on the wiki page, which is just as important. >>> (2) Polyomorphic functions >>> >>> would be the priorities, and allow a nearly full wrapping of STL. If >>> time permits >> Doesn't polymorphic functions work currently? I'd think that were >> one of >> the few C++ things that *do* work in Cython. >> >> Do you mean "overloaded" functions? > > Yes, that's the more specific term I really meant. :-) I guess polymorphism means a lot of things. But at least in C++-lingo it's a common phrase for "virtual methods", i.e. vtables, which made it even more confusing. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
