Stefan Behnel wrote: > Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> I am also for supporting only a subset of what >>> is possible--if one really needs crazy stuff like differently >>> implemented prefix/postfix decrements and -> vs (*). one can code in C >>> ++ or use clever macros. (Would we need to expose ++, a.k.a >>> "__next__" for STL iterators?) >> Yes, you need ++/-- for std::list<T>::iterator, which doesn't accept any >> form of += > > Am I missing something here? Why isn't the for-loop syntax enough for C++ > iterators?
Who's saying that you always want to iterate through all elements from beginning to end in one go? But yes, one could use the for-loop syntax for that specific case. (However myself I'm in favor of even getting the most basic things working before adding support in higher-level constructs.) -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
