Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> I am also for supporting only a subset of what >> is possible--if one really needs crazy stuff like differently >> implemented prefix/postfix decrements and -> vs (*). one can code in C >> ++ or use clever macros. (Would we need to expose ++, a.k.a >> "__next__" for STL iterators?) > > Yes, you need ++/-- for std::list<T>::iterator, which doesn't accept any > form of +=
Am I missing something here? Why isn't the for-loop syntax enough for C++ iterators? Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
