Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: >> Seems to me that explaining how Cython could make everyone's (including >> Nokia's) life much easier, providing things important to IPython / >> Scipy / Enthought, and potentially enhancing Cython with a capability to >> parse C/C++ headers could be a pretty big win all around. > > Enthought certainly already know about and appriciate Cython. But they > likely has neither money nor manpower to spare now (not that I really > know anything about it, but there's this crisis and so on). I don't > really see them taking on developing Cython in addition to everything > else they are developing, just to make switch from PyQT in a "cleaner" > fashion.
Hmm. Perhaps this isn't what you meant at all. But at any rate the point seems to be moot, as discussed by Robert K. and Mattieu -- and I definitely see their point, I'd seriously doubt using Cython for wrapping QT myself at this point, since QT is so C++-centric. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
