On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:

> Robert Bradshaw skrev:
>> Thanks! This has been a much requested feature. Could we include this
>> in the cython repo? (Maybe in the tools directory?)
>>
>> - Robert
>>
> Sure, put it where you want, but beware of viral license... There is  
> no
> license mentioned in the file, but it can be assumed LGPL v2. as it
> originates from KDE's Python syntax file. KDE does not mention a  
> license
> in the Python syntax-file either, but KATE is LGPL v2, so we can  
> assume
> that.

That's fine by me, but I would not have guessed. Could you put a GPL  
header on the top, acknowledging that it's a derivative work of the  
KATE Python file?

> Note that it still has couple of rough corners. It does not highlight
> class and function names like IDLE does. Also it highlights everything
> everywhere, so you can get names like readonly and public highlighted
> even when not used as a keyword. I'm still not sure how to fix this,  
> as
> KDE's XML syntax is not nice to work with.

I don't use KATE, but I bet it's still a nice step forward.

- Robert


_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to