Robert Bradshaw skrev: > That's fine by me, but I would not have guessed. Could you put a GPL > header on the top, acknowledging that it's a derivative work of the > KATE Python file? > Yes.
It will only apply to this particular xml file anyway, not source code written using it to highlight syntax. I'll mention that so it don't get scary. >> Note that it still has couple of rough corners. It does not highlight >> class and function names like IDLE does. Also it highlights everything >> everywhere, so you can get names like readonly and public highlighted >> even when not used as a keyword. I'm still not sure how to fix this, >> as >> KDE's XML syntax is not nice to work with. >> > > I don't use KATE, but I bet it's still a nice step forward. > > It's a derivative work of "katepart", a common KDE component. Thus it applies to anything else in KDE that highlights syntax, including the much bigger KDevelop IDE. S.M. _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
