Robert Bradshaw, 27.07.2010 11:07: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> Given the potentially large performance benefit, I think you should >> consider this patch (or something like it that's perhaps a little >> cleaner) for 0.13. > > It's certainly worth considering!
Given that this is a change that may potentially break stuff and we don't even have tests for it, I think we should not let this delay the release of 0.13 any further than we already did anyway. Most people don't test development releases, so I expect a lot of bug reports after the release of 0.13 that will make 0.13.1 (and maybe even 0.13.2) a close follow-up anyway. However, if someone writes suitable tests for all affected special methods in a timely fashion, I'd be +0 on inclusion, just for the same reason of getting a 0.13.1 out soon anyway, in which we may still rip it back out. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
