Carl Witty, 28.07.2010 03:11: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> What would you consider suitable tests? All I can think of is to >>> write Cython classes that define all the special methods, then write >>> Python code that extracts each special method as a bound method and >>> then calls it. Can you think of more tests? >> >> That would be sufficient, and a very good test to have. > > The test patch is up at #561. > > I tested it under Python 2.5 and 2.6.
Thanks. When we apply it, Hudson will test the others. > By the way, how do you test under Python 3? I tried "make test3" > (after changing python3.0 to python3.1 in the Makefile) but got this > error: > > python3.1 runtests.py -vv --no-cython Ah, yes, looks like the make target is broken. Remove the "--no-cython" switch, it'll just work out of the box. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
