On 12/12/2010 05:29 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> <rober...@math.washington.edu>  wrote:
>    
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kern<robert.k...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>      
>>> On 2010-12-11 17:09 , Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>>>> <arfrever....@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> 2010-12-11 12:01:11 Robert Bradshaw napisaƂ(a):
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Release candidate up at
>>>>>> http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.14.rc0.tar.gz . Unless something
>>>>>> bad is discovered, this will be the release sometime early next week.
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Some tests fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Test failures with Python 2.6 (the same tests fail with Python 2.7):
>>>>>            
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Not sue what's up with all these numpy errors, but many (not all) of
>>>> them look like a change in formatting of error messages. The basic
>>>> functionality still seems to be passing--does anyone know if this is a
>>>> regression?
>>>>          
>>> I think so. I think these are real regressions:
>>>
>>>    ValueError: Does not understand character buffer dtype format string 
>>> (':')
>>>
>>>   From regular Python, I've tried a few of the dtype() calls that you make, 
>>> and
>>> they seem to work fine. I don't see a problem in the generated code, though.
>>>        
>> They all work for me too, but maybe that's because I'm using an older
>> version of NumPy (the one that ships with Sage). Has anyone tried
>> Numpy 1.5 with Cython 0.13?
>>      
> OK, I just install Numpy 1.5.1, and all the tests pass for me with
> both 0.13 and 0.14.rc0 (Python 2.6, OS X). Anyone else able to
> reproduce these errors? Arfrever, can you try Cython 0.13 in your
> setup?
>    

The thing that has happened here is that the new NumPy supports the PEP 
3118 protocol, and so the code in numpy.pxd is not used, but instead the 
other code. Probably new tests should be written, perhaps some changes 
must be done to buffer format string parsing, and so on. But it is 
unlikely to be a regression in Cython, nothing changed here w.r.t 
Cython  0.13.x.


Dag Sverre
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
Cython-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to