On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote: > On 12/12/2010 05:29 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw >> <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kern<robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2010-12-11 17:09 , Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis >>>>> <arfrever....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2010-12-11 12:01:11 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a): >>>>>> >>>>>>> Release candidate up at >>>>>>> http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.14.rc0.tar.gz . Unless something >>>>>>> bad is discovered, this will be the release sometime early next week. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Some tests fail. >>>>>> >>>>>> Test failures with Python 2.6 (the same tests fail with Python 2.7): >>>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> Not sue what's up with all these numpy errors, but many (not all) of >>>>> them look like a change in formatting of error messages. The basic >>>>> functionality still seems to be passing--does anyone know if this is a >>>>> regression? >>>>> >>>> I think so. I think these are real regressions: >>>> >>>> ValueError: Does not understand character buffer dtype format string >>>> (':') >>>> >>>> From regular Python, I've tried a few of the dtype() calls that you >>>> make, and >>>> they seem to work fine. I don't see a problem in the generated code, >>>> though. >>>> >>> They all work for me too, but maybe that's because I'm using an older >>> version of NumPy (the one that ships with Sage). Has anyone tried >>> Numpy 1.5 with Cython 0.13? >>> >> OK, I just install Numpy 1.5.1, and all the tests pass for me with >> both 0.13 and 0.14.rc0 (Python 2.6, OS X). Anyone else able to >> reproduce these errors? Arfrever, can you try Cython 0.13 in your >> setup? >> > > The thing that has happened here is that the new NumPy supports the PEP > 3118 protocol, and so the code in numpy.pxd is not used, but instead the > other code. Probably new tests should be written, perhaps some changes > must be done to buffer format string parsing, and so on. But it is > unlikely to be a regression in Cython, nothing changed here w.r.t > Cython 0.13.x.
That would make sense, thanks. I didn't think much had changed with numpy support on our side, but didn't know for sure. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
