On 12/9/13, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:36 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: >> Can a plane bring down a building in a controlled demolition style >> way? > > The best thing seems be, if you would test it. Steal a big plane, don't > hijack it and before you fly into a building warn them, so that they can > evacuate the building and surrounding streets and position cameras > everywhere. > > I don't believe in huge conspiracies.
You don't have to believe in them for them to be true. Your belief, or lack of, is not relevant to the events, nor to the existence of the events. It is evident to me, that you have not done a lot of research (or reading and viewing of other people's research) regarding the "9/11" event. > Small conspiracies are possible, something like "your mother and your > brother will kill you, to get the money from the life assurance", huge > conspiracies are fantasy only. It seems you live in a fantasy world Ralph. What is a conspiracy? People conspiring (ie discussing and making agreements amongst themselves) outside of the public view. Most large/huge corporate takeovers are discussed privately amongst the aggressor purchasor company (assuming aggressive takeover) directors, out of the public view and public record. They are _conspiring_ together, to take over the other company, and only make public their intention, at last possible minute, to maximise advantage. Military generals in war, and politicians conspire regarding war and the starting of wars (or "peaceful interventions to institute democracy and remove WMDs" is the current politically correct term for unilateral aggressive military action). You must believe in the "small" insurance conspiring (someone organises their warehouse or car to burn in a fire, to collect the insurance money)? Yet you would not believe that the same species (humans) would "conspire" for a large insurance scam, with a few other individuals, to utilize that scam for other purposes at the same time (like an excuse "America is under attack" therefore "we must fight back" against Iraq ... oh wait, that's right, it was the Taliban and Al-quaida, which is why "the coalition of the willing" had to "attack" afganistan). No no, no conspiracy in any of this ... all discussions were public, the news told us the truth, and the democratically elected governments of the West were doing no more than following the directive of their constituents! Please! Move along! Nothing to see here! Not any conspiracy, let alone a large one! Hey you over there! Move along NOW!! and NEVER question your politicians. > If huge conspiracies would be possible, > we wouldn't know about the ""legal" mafias", all the marketing > strategies, lobbies. On another note Ralph, I do think Chris' implied suggestion is a good one - start a wordpress blog, it is very easy to do, and allows for you to speak those things you believe to be self evident, truthful, disgraceful etc, without ever going offtopic (even by debian-ot standards :) :) Seriously, this new fangled Internet thing provides a platform for the (even mildly) oppressed! This is a very good thing, you must agree yes? You have a voice, and those who empathise and align with your bulletins, communiques and "reports from the trenches", may (at your option) be allowed to comment on and respond to those releases that you make. And the truth is, because it is your own blog, even trivial and ordinarily-superficial or not accepted "rants" are accepted - since it is in fact your blog, not theirs. And if your blog is somewhat Debian related, you might (possibly, I don't know for sure sorry) be forgiven for just happening to mention it in one of your replies (eg to this email thread), and heaven forbid if your blog URL were to be in your .sig ... scandalous. Have fun, Zenaan _______________________________________________ D-community-offtopic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
