I sort of understand where you are coming from, and obviously none of us can make you do something you don't want to. I've made similar remarks about Maven some years ago, but things do change.
I personally don't see a lot of value in maintaining a separate (but not equal) build system, so I can't see going down that path. I'd be happy to help out with converting over completely if that were in the plans, though. Anyway, good luck with the ongoing fixes. I think we all appreciate seeing the project move forward with bugfixes again. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Richard Cyganiak <[email protected]> wrote: > Jesse, respectfully, I'd prefer not to get any further into this discussion. > I'm doing my bit to keep D2RQ growing, and I'm more productive with Ant than > with Maven. If you consider Maven easy and useful, then you could walk the > talk and collaborate with Bob to make an up-to-date mavenized version of D2RQ. > > Thanks, > Richard > > > On 28 Feb 2012, at 15:06, Jesse Sightler wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Richard Cyganiak <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Nothing is rather easy with Maven. Maven is almost as awful as EJBs. >> >> I'm curious what gives you this impression? Modern Maven is actually >> pretty easy to use (easier than Ant in a lot of cases, IMO). >> >> Even Eclipse manages to support it pretty well now, and they were by >> far the slowest to get Maven support in the past. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ d2rq-map-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel
