Nate Lowrie wrote: > On 12/18/06, johnf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Monday 18 December 2006 11:16, Paul McNett wrote: >>> johnf wrote: >>>> Sorry Nate I disagree with respect of extending AppWizard. I would like >>>> to see the AppWizard dropped. Let me say I use AppWizard everytime I >>>> want to test the data interfaces but that's all. > > I by no means said extend the App Wizard. I was referring to a > tutorial about taking an App that starts in App Wizard and then > delving into the code to change the standard interface to reflect the > individuals needs. It was suggested as a resource for > programming/dabo newbies who gained experience and want to take and > customize programs that they may have used the App Wizard to create > back when they didn't know anything else. > > I have tested out the App Wizard a grand total of 3 times so far. I > don't use it for production projects. It is nice for some things but > I have to side with Ed on the point of it being misused and > misrepresented as the do-everything-for-you, > this-is-the-only-thing-that-dabo-is application by people that don't > have enough programming experience to know any better.
I'm not picking on you, but it seems that there are some assumptions going around that, as far as I know, aren't really substantiated by evidence: + That the AppWizard is misrepresented as a do-it-all, or that the AppWizard *is* Dabo. If it is misrepresented as that, please provide citations. + That the AppWizard is being misused. We need a definition for "misused" and examples of such misuse cited. These would be great starting points for the tutorial on AppWizard, if substantiated. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
