On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Uwe Grauer wrote:
> OK, revision 2590 broke it.
> Now you can guess better why it was broken with rev 2590.
> rev 2589 did work.
OK, I looked up that change, and it was a pretty major one. I know
of two outstanding issues that I should have cleaned up soon, so keep
an eye out for updates.
The problem was the introduction of the choice to keep the class
code in the cdxml itself, or in a separate .py file. Right now the
separate file version isn't working correctly.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
