On 1/16/07, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:40 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > > > >> Agreed on the relative status of dabo versus ide. The same version > >> numbers tell people immediately which version of the ide they want > >> versus version of dabo. Do you have another suggestion for easily > >> accomplishing that? > > > > Well, lessee... they need Python 2.3, SQLite 3, wxPython 2.6, > > ReportLab ?? > > > > The ide tools could check the framework version, and if there was a > > minimum required, would be able to report that to the user. They > > don't have to be the same number, and in most cases, people won't > > care, as long as it works. > > That would work. > > > > I think that using the same version numbers when the different > > products are at very different development points is much more > > confusing. > > It has just been the case that we tend to release things together, and > it has been easier for them to have the same "major.point" version. But > they are different projects, so they can be decoupled. > > What about planning on jumping from Dabo 0.8 to Dabo 1.0 (IOW, after we > release Dabo 0.8 as stable, make the dev branch 1.0a), while planning > for the IDE to stay at 0.8, 0.9, 0.10, 0.11, etc. until we feel it is at > 1.0 status?
I like this plan. I feel that the IDE is somewhat far off from it's 1.0 release. I think that we need to integrate the various tools into a common development environment before we can call it 1.0... After all, it is supposed to be an Integrated Development Environment. I think that the framework is worthy of a 1.0 status soon. > > > -- > pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
