On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Uwe Grauer wrote:
> But if it isn't expected to produce something useful it doesn't make
> sense to call it "file.py"
Depends on how you define 'useful'. If you mean 'a complete runnable
program', then no, I guess it's not useful. But by that standard, 90%
of Dabo is not useful either, since each file is not meant to be a
standalone program. Most modules similarly are not useful, either,
since they are meant to be imported instead of run directly.
It is a perfectly legal Python file, and as such .py is appropriate.
Your exe comparison doesn't make sense, since the *only* use for an
executable is to be executed.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
