Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Uwe Grauer wrote:
> 
>> Are you saying, that if you would have integrated them as python
>> properties, it should get handled in dFormMixin the same way as it  
>> works
>> in CD forms?
>> For what is that code in dFormMixin.__init__() (check of CxnFile,
>> CxnName) good for? Is it for nonstandard usage of the framework?
>>
>> I still don't understand why CD forms get different handling than  
>> coded
>> forms.
> 
>       Uwe, you have to remember that the original design for dForm was  
> done 3-4 years ago, and the Class Designer was not even thought about  
> at the time. These properties were only added a few months ago in  
> order to enable the Class Designer to work with saved connection  
> info, rather than forcing users to write code to establish connections.
> 
>       The reason it works differently is that this is still a work in  
> progress. I'm sure that if I had a second set of eyes reviewing all  
> of the changes made to the Class Designer such discrepancies would be  
> much rarer. But Paul has been too busy to become involved with the  
> whole Class Designer/IDE process, so things like this happen.
> 

That shouldn't be a problem.
But everytime a user sees code that doesn't follow the standard
recommendations he has to ask for the reason to not follow the standard.
I will create a ticket for this to remember the culprit.

New ticket is:
http://svn.dabodev.com/trac/dabo/ticket/1073

Uwe


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to