Ed Leafe wrote: > The reason it works differently is that this is still a work in > progress. I'm sure that if I had a second set of eyes reviewing all > of the changes made to the Class Designer such discrepancies would be > much rarer. But Paul has been too busy to become involved with the > whole Class Designer/IDE process, so things like this happen.
I'm still going to be kind of scarce with helping out with the new stuff, at least through 2008, but will try to spend more time doing code review at least. I just have one more meeting today, and then I can go home, take a blanket and pillow out to the hammock, and crash. (The verdict of today is that, even though my project is way over budget, I get to continue, for the foreseeable future. Yay for me! Yay for Dabo!) Thanks to Dabo's modularity, I don't see any reason why I can't build out new features using cdxml while keeping my hand-coded classes around, too. Actually, Ed, would that work? Say I have a set of base classes done in raw Python/Dabo. Could I make subclasses/instances of those in the Class Designer, saved as cdxml, or is that a pipedream? What about the inverse (coded subclasses of cdxml classes)? -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
