On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:28, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> I missed this part before. By default, any column in the dataset > >> that does not exist in the underlying table should be automatically > >> excluded from any updates. I think I see a problem in the way that > >> dBackend handles this; I should have a potential fix soon. > > > > OK, I was a bit optimistic. Besides having a few other things come > > up, I've found a few bad assumptions in some of the logic for the > > code that determines structures. There are some assumptions that hold > > for some backends and not others. I hope to be able to dig into this > > more today, but I don't know when I'll have a fix. > > OK, John - try the latest commits, and let me know if the problem > disappears. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com
This appears to fix the problem I was having with my inserts (my special case where the field I want to exclude is not part of the table). But I think it is not respecting the NonUpdateField list. I added a field that exist in the table (backend table) to my NonUpdateField list and I can see that it was still present in the insert statement. -- John Fabiani _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
