On Thursday, November 11, 2010 05:04:25 pm Paul McNett wrote: > On 11/11/10 5:01 PM, John Fabiani wrote: > > Wait - just re-thinking a bit. After the new() the RowCount should again > > report zero (unless "ss" is the default). > > I think the filtering should happen when filter() is called. > > > Hmmm - of course I think the RowCount should follow the filter. > > So if you've filtered on a field value and then you change the value of > that field in one of the records, you want that record to get filtered out > immediately? I think that would be user-hostile. > > Paul
Maybe - but that's how I think - the filter would still apply as far as RowCount is concerned. Johnf _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
