On 11/11/10 5:29 PM, John Fabiani wrote: > On Thursday, November 11, 2010 05:04:25 pm Paul McNett wrote: >> On 11/11/10 5:01 PM, John Fabiani wrote: >>> Wait - just re-thinking a bit. After the new() the RowCount should again >>> report zero (unless "ss" is the default). >> >> I think the filtering should happen when filter() is called. >> >>> Hmmm - of course I think the RowCount should follow the filter. >> >> So if you've filtered on a field value and then you change the value of >> that field in one of the records, you want that record to get filtered out >> immediately? I think that would be user-hostile. >> >> Paul > > Maybe - but that's how I think - the filter would still apply as far as > RowCount is concerned.
You want RowCount to have special treatment? So even though there are 4 records, including one that no longer matches the filter, you'd want RowCount to report 3? I'd like some of what you are smoking, John! :) Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
