On 3/3/11 12:00 AM, Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 19:27, Paul McNett wrote:
>> On 3/2/11 10:04 AM, Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2011 18:28, Nate Lowrie wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:20, Paul McNett<[email protected]>     wrote:
>>>>> On 3/2/11 3:22 AM, Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
>>>>>> Not that I would always remember but any chance that this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/branches/0.11-stable/contrib/trac-post-commit-hook
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or similar could be activated on the dabo trac?
>>>>> Personally, it smells too implicit to me. I vote -1.
>>>> -1 from me to because of the implicit nature.
>>>>
>>> Why do both of you consider this solution implicit?   Commiter has to
>>> add specific text to make this work.
>>>
>>> Who is expected to close the tickets?  The commiter or the reporter?
>>>
>>> I think it should be the commiter, if ever it isn't really fixed then
>>> the reporter can always reopen it.
>> So far it is +1 for, -2 against. I'm willing to try it if it gains support. 
>> I just
>> don't see a big need being addressed here, and possible detriments. We want
>> developers interacting with the trac system, not overly enabled to avoid it.
>>
>> Yes, the committer should ideally close the ticket.
>>
>> What if a commit log went something like "I think this probably fixes ticket 
>> #5555
>> but not quite sure so I'm keeping it open for now"?
> In this case it would be nice if there would be a status "needs
> testing", but as there isn't it should be left open and the commit
> should use instead of "fixed #1000101" use "refs #1000101", so the
> reporter sees that something has happened but it is not sure that it is
> totally fixed.
>
> If no one else besides me wants this then just leave it as is.

Only three people have weighed in.

Paul


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]

Reply via email to