On 8/31/11 9:44 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> > I think your points are reasonable. Dabo should define which keys are >> > available for a >> > given backend. I agree that the "extra stuff" key doesn't belong in the >> > XML or to >> > display to the user in CxnEditor, however I think there should be a way >> > to get >> > something working in code if we haven't yet implemented a valid key in >> > Dabo. > True, but the entire connection mechanism is different: we can't use > the dConnectInfo/dConnection classes without some major changes, as we don't > have any support for connection strings. Those classes are predicated on > dbapi-style connections, and the ODBC classes will require some additional > work to be able to recognize ODBC-type backends and craft the appropriate > connection string instead of setting attributes from the keys.
Yes, dConnectInfo/dConnection would need to be reworked. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
