Paul McNett schrieb: > On 8/31/11 6:33 AM, Thomas Ganss wrote: > >> I got some results, but then came work from a totally different direction >> and I never followed up to make it a rounded package was only needed as >> a demo. >> > > Dabo would benefit immensely with a pyodbc wrapper. I think though we should > define > specific wrappers like: > > mssql_odbc > vfp_odbc > dbase_odbc > > and perhaps also add a plain-vanilla odbc wrapper which needs to be > subclassed by the > appdev for a given proprietary API. > Part of the reason I dropped it was that I realized I'd either port first to SQLite for workstation work or need either PyADO / vfpOLEDB or advantage drivers, as most of the real data I am involved with uses binary indeces or some other post-vfp6 enhancement, which made PyODBC unusable for those tables.
But if I get something I consider "stable", I will add it to DABO. The changes to Rogers' code were on the order of a dozen lines. If there is a PyODBC (base) class I will certainly use it if I try for advantage, either through sub-classing or by adding a mixin (which I am not really comfortable to think in, as my standard way of thinking is still vfp inheritance- but a chance to learn) regards thomas --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
