Użytkownik Paul McNett napisał: > And neither of you two seem to understand the point of my changes. It isn't > about > flicker, and it isn't about wanting to delay the child requeries. It is > simply about > optimizing - in the UI - the quick navigation of records.
I do understand and agree with your goals but disagree the way you achieve it. I'm just a bit angry because half of my existing code stop working with your changes. I previously mentioned how much I hate timing code because it's unpredictable. Now you break data integrity chain in both, business and UI layer what makes me crying, while you could achieve the same results with the way I show in example, with one exception, make "defferChild" function a class public interface member. If you want introduce such changes in the framework, why not simply defer entire "_moveRecordPointer" method call? Result the same and data integrity remain achieved. -- Regards Jacek Kałucki _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
