On 11/2/11 9:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > I've been observing this thread from the sidelines, because I don't > have much of a stake in the outcome.:) But I see a framework-level > distinction that might be of use. > > When you define two bizobjs to be in a parent-child relationship, the > framework will dutifully run the necessary requeries to keep them in sync. If > you don't want that to happen, then you should not be defining the > relationship that way. In Paul's case, instead of adding the child bizobjs as > children of the parent, perhaps you could create a separate collection for > these delayed requery bizobjs, and in your delay method, manually requery all > members of that collection. This way you aren't breaking the framework > behavior, but still get the behavior required for your app. IOW, this seems > to be an app-specific need, not a framework need. > > Does that make any sense?
But: + I *want* the bizobjs to to be in the parent/child relationships + I want the framework to dutifully requery the children when appropriate + I simply want a UI feature to make row navigation much faster + I thought that this would be of general interest Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
