On 2/3/12 11:46 AM, Nick Raptis wrote: > So, it seems to not matter that much after all. If anything, your > implementation is consistent across platforms.
Ok then. :) > Anyway, just for fun, I'm attaching a naive diff against r7606 of what > it would take to have a Timer that both doesn't drift AND doesn't miss > hits (not sure if the latter is at all desirable though). Have you tested this on Linux and Windows and confirm both lack of drift and no missed calls? Note that one feature of callAfterInterval() is to keep multiple calls from occuring. So if callAfterInterval() is called again for the same function and args before the first interval has fired, the original is discarded and now we wait for the current-call's interval. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
