Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Uwe Grauer wrote: > >> I'm more complaining about the missing hierarchy documentation here. >> If __init__() would be used the documentation clearly should be in the >> source. Your documentation style is always too sparse (at least for >> me). > > But that begs the question: why do you *need* hierarchy information > to create applications? Everything that you need should be obvious; > if it isn't, you shouldn't be crawling the class hierarchy to get it; > you should be asking about it here so that it can be corrected.
In Dabo i have to know where to look for, to get a functionality i want to use. Therefor i need to know the class hierarchy. If that wouldn't be the case, the docs would reflect the objects functionality (or at least, where to look for it). There wouldn't be a need to ask for it. Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
