Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Uwe Grauer wrote: > >> What's wrong with wrappers for begin/commit/rollback in the bizobj? > > I didn't say anything was wrong with them; I was simply asking if > you tried to code things the way that the current bizobj was designed > to work. >
I didn't try it because i always search for ways to improve it to make it easier to code. But every time i try to come up with improvements you seem to disapprove it. You rejected to change the way deletes are coded in the bizobj. So i have to code this for myself everywhere. If childs would be deleted prior to the parent there wouldn't be the need to do this all the time for myself. At least the implementation details would be hidden if there would be methods for begin/commit/rollback in the bizobj. So may i add begin/commit/rollback to the bizobj or are there real concerns not to do it? Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
