On Jan 9, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote:
> I reverted a set of commits with changes for 1.0 from the working branch, and
> instead
> kept them in a new working-1.0 branch.
When I'm developing, I can have several local branches for various
things, but "working" is the only one propagated to GitHub. It is the one that
devs or users who want to test upcoming changes will use.
Dabo users should be on master if they want the stable stuff; they
shouldn't use working unless they are prepared for potential breakage. I think
that you should keep these breaking changes in working so that they get better
tested, and so we learn what we need to better document.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
