On Feb 11, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I thought that namespaces were managed by dicts, and that they were all
>> pointers to each other, so having, say, dabo.dApp defined doesn't take up
>> any significant memory over not adding it to the namespace.
>
> That's my understanding as well. But look at all the stuff that dApp.py
> imports.
> Let's not do that until and unless it's needed is all I'm say'n.
I understand that there may be some use cases where not all that stuff
is needed. But IMO, the default behavior should be the one that reflects the
majority of use cases. I don't believe that the examples you gave constitute a
majority, but am anxious to hear from others.
The only thing that is being questioned is the default of
implicitImports=False. Why shouldn't that default to True, and the developer
can change that to False for those few cases where it is advantageous to not
implicitly import?
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
